I’m Nobody! Who are you? by Emily Dickerson analysis 

In my opinion, I’m Nobody! Who are you? is a poem about not wanting to be in the public eye and wanting to remain anonymous. 
This is created in the use of pronouns throughout the poem. It uses the pronouns ‘I’ and ‘you’ and ‘us’. This use of direct address creates a very personal touch to the poem. This links to the theme of privacy as often people think that being public is to loose your privacy and for everyone to know everything about you. So it could suggest that the person prefers being close with people rather than being known. It draws the reader into the poem and makes them feel involved in the poem though the use of direct address and the personal tone this creates. The personal tone is also created by the short clauses and the use of punctuation in the poem, these give the poem an informal tone that is conversational and makes it easy for the audience to feel a part of the poem. 

The pronouns could also links to the idea of being anonymous as it doesn’t use names or any clear sign of identification in the poem. The use of the ‘us’ pronoun creates ideas of the outsider and the idea of us against them. This is typical of literature as characters and personas are often seen as underdogs and this makes them relatable. 

The simile ‘how public, like a frog to tell your name the lifelong day to an admiring bog’ shows the personas hatred of fame. By using the noun ‘frog’ to describe a person who is public shows her contempt as frogs are seen as disgusting, slimy creatures. It shows that the persona sees the people who want fame to be disgusting and animalistic (almost like they’re desperate to be known). It could suggest that being public makes you lose yourself and that have now lost their humanity. The use of the word ‘name’ shows that the persona doesn’t see names as important and in critiquing these people’s want for their name to be known it shows that she sees other things as being more important. The oxymoron ‘admiring bog’ adds to this idea. The adjective ‘admiring’ has images of being adored whereas a ‘bog’ is a toilet. This therefore shows that the persona doesn’t think it is important to be admired. It shows that being adored by a person (who is nothing more that an object as they have no personality other than being obsessed with the new thing) is unimportant and isn’t needed in life. However it could suggest that the persona would rather be admired by something with substance, so instead of a ‘bog’ admiring her she wants an intelligent person to adore her. 

The fact that her poems don’t have titles is atypical of 19th century poems as they usually do have titles. Also the use of short lines and clauses is atypical. This atypical form suggests that the persona holds contempt for the poets of the time and it links to the idea present in the poem that being public is bad. It suggests that Dickenson herself doesn’t want to be known in the public and that she is a private person. Dickenson was a very private poet and she herself never published her poems. It shows that she was more concerned about creating good art that meant something rather than doing what was expected of her and becoming famous. 

During the 19th century people of a high class would be absorbed in whoever was seen as the new big thing and this person would be shown to all the other high class people and shown off by people who knew them. So this whole poem is making fun of this process and in particular the people who want to be known. However, this admiring of people is still present if not more present today in the modern world. This therefore makes the poem relatable no matter when it is read and the poem is almost timeless. 

Advertisements

Why Representation is Needed 

In the 21st century there has been lots of progress in representation , this has been across all genres (books, TV shows, films etc). However, there is unfortunately still a lack of representation. You still see a lot of white, heterosexual, cisgender able-bodied men as main characters (or prominent characters). 

Society cannot change without representation. Progress can’t be made without representation. People have these built up stereotypes of groups of people they don’t regularly see and the only way to break these stereotypes is for them to be represented in the media. But this doesn’t just mean having one character of a race/gender/sexuality/disability, it means having multiple characters of each. 

Within the representation there should be a variety of characters and who aren’t defined by who they are and aren’t all stereotypes. These characters should show all the sides of a group and show the diversity within a group. Only then can people truly understand these groups. This is how people who are uneducated on issues such as race, gender, sexualities and disabilities change there mind and realise they are just people too and that they are normal. 

But not only is representation needed as it helps people understand these groups it also makes members of these groups feel more validated. Lack of representation can causes self hate so representation is needed for self acceptance. 

It can also make people feel happy as they can finally see themselves in fiction that they know and love (great shows are made great with good representation of groups you are in). 

Ultimately representation is needed for acceptance of all kinds. 

Expect the Unexpected 

In July I never thought that Brexit would happen. I honestly believed the UK would choose the most progressive and economically sound option. However, the UK acted on their inner hate and chose an option that would stop immigrant (I know some people voted out of other reasons but most people deep down voted out of racism).A similar thing happened just this month. Never in a million years did I think that Donald Trump would actually become president. In America people again voted the racist option. 

These two acts have now validated the inner racism in people (sexism and homophobia have also been validated by Trump) and have had such large effects on the whole world. 

I have now learned to expect the unexpected and for horrible events not to shock me. Truly I have learnt that hate will always win and that is a lesson I wish I never knew.